In a few days, the Commerce Department will release personal savings rate data for June. Meanwhile, in May the personal savings rate was 12.4 percent, which is the lowest it had been since February of 2020. But, as this chart shows, that was still far above historical experience. And it does not include the increased wealth that comes from higher prices for stocks and real estate.
The theory that inflation will subside as soon as the economy gets “back to normal” strikes me as incoherent. If “back to normal” means that all of this excess saving gets worked off, then consumer spending is going to surge. If “back to normal” means that firms invest in new capacity to get rid of supply constraints, then business investment is going to surge. For example,
Mr. Gelsinger, after little more than a month in the top job, committed Intel to making $20 billion in chip-plant investments in Arizona. Less than two months later, he added a $3.5 billion expansion plan in New Mexico. The Intel CEO has said more financial commitments are on the drawing board, both in the U.S. and overseas.
For me, the indicator that we are “back to normal” is the real interest rate, meaning the interest rate minus the rate of inflation. If that is slightly positive, we are at normal. For the last several months, it has been steeply negative, and it seem poised to remain that way for at least the rest of this year.
If you bought a 3-month T-bill in March, you paid an inflation tax of close to 10 percent at an annual rate. That’s what you get for trusting the market.
The key standout is that you really didn’t want to own Treasury bonds. The near 40% loss of purchasing power over 10 years is somewhat notional—it is derived from the compound annual returns on 10 Year Treasurys compiled by New York University’s Stern School of Business, divided by the consumer-price index—but tells a story nonetheless.
The worst thing you could have done in the 1970s would have been to trust the bond market. Today, you certainly won’t find me owning any long-term bonds that aren’t indexed for inflation.
For me, this is the first recession/recovery cycle that has had very noticeable personal effects for those who never became involuntarily unemployed. In the aftermath of 2008, I wasn’t unemployed so it wasn’t really possible to discern a recession had occurred unless I looked at macroeconomic data or my stock portfolio.
Pretty much every restaurant I go to has a now hiring sign. Occasionally, restaurants are closed altogether, and most have reduced hours due to a labor shortage. Service at restaurants is, as you’d expect, generally terrible.
There’s also a shortage of random goods. It’s been noticeable how often I go to the grocery store and the item I’m looking for is completely sold out. It’s not as if that never happened pre-COVID, but it seems to be happening with increased frequency now.
The value of used cars remains extremely high relative to new cars, and various consumer electronics cannot be had after being available for the better part of a year.
For me, normalcy is that all of these factors largely go away. Restaurants and grocery stores seem to have sufficient staff and are open to normal hours. The random shortages occur with far less frequency. A used car returns more or less to the historical discount to new. If you want an Xbox more than 3 months after it is released, it’s not nearly impossible to get one.
The real (or perhaps I should say nominal) question is what happens to prices over the rest of the year. If the labor force remains tight and measured CPI is in the 5%+ context for 2021, I think there’s a significant risk that pay packages will need to reflect the higher inflation environment. That could start a wage/price spiral, in which firms would need to raise prices in 2022 to cover the higher cost of labor. Ending that spiral would require contractionary policy, although my sense is that Biden and the Democrats wouldn’t appreciate contractionary policy in an election year.
I’m not so sure that Intel or the chip industry in general is a good representative example of the supply constraints.
1) Intel has had an identity crisis going on for a decade+ now. After losing tablets, phones, etc., they are still struggling to figure out which master to serve. They have certainly made significant profits in the server market, but less so elsewhere (particularly in automotive). Also, they cannot seem to figure out their secret sauce. Design and outsource the manufacturing vs. doing it all in house. Why choose one over the other? Insourcing non-Intel silicon? Why…what do the margins look like vs. TSMC or Samsung?
2) the chip manufacturers vastly over estimated the duration of the virus on demand for chips. They did so primarily because their clients did so after canceling or scaling back various long term supply contracts with them. So, we are stuck with a shortage of chips, primarily in the automotive sector, but I’m thinking that this is a temporary blip as capacity comes back online.
No duh, but the rental car companies also bet too far in the wrong direction.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hertz-avis-enterprise-rental-car-shortage-11618335385?st=ycvg9sn86ff0hjl&reflink=article_copyURL_share
Intel will probably be one step behind (as per the usual) and may end up with a glut of manufacturing capacity (the recently announced GlobalFoundries acquisition as well as their other home grown manufacturing facilities).
I’ll let the smart guys make the calls, but I won’t be directly buying any Intel stock anytime soon.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tsmc-expects-auto-chip-shortage-to-abate-this-quarter-11626347114?st=p2whf67nldmn7w3&reflink=article_copyURL_share
You wrote… “For me, the indicator that we are “back to normal” is the real interest rate, meaning the interest rate minus the rate of inflation. If that is slightly positive, we are at normal.”
I think a price level closer to the Core PCE index best fit line is an indication of return to H2 2019 pre-pandemic conditions. It is not sufficient as an indication of normalcy in general but as an indicator of H2 2019 economic conditions it might be a good one. I hope one thing that will never be normal again is indoor air quality but I’m not optimistic. Since you mentioned the real rate I wanted to write about that.
For me a “back to normal” condition can allow for a negative real rate. For example, the 1 year Treasury bond rate minus the Core PCE 1 year rate was negative from mid-2009 to the end of 2017. The starting date is the end of the GFC recession in the U.S.. Perhaps a person might say this was not a normal period because of the 10% apogee unemployment rate in the U.S. and a government debt problem was developing in Europe. Ignoring smaller countries it looked like European government bonds were at normal looking rates by 2014 so this measure of the real rate was negative for a period of more than 3 years (2014 to 2017) in a somewhat normal looking environment. If private sector debt worries in China in 2015 and 2016 makes the period “not normal” then shorten the periods of somewhat normal conditions to 2014 alone and 2017 alone.
Furthermore the period of 2002 to 2004 is another time when this measure of the real rate was negative for much of the time.
Furthermore this measure of the real rate was negative in the H2 2019 which a person might say was normal time.
If we will allow a mismatch in duration, a measure of the real rate might be the 10 year Treasury rate minus the Core PCE 1 year rate. That was slightly negative briefly at various times in the past decade before the pandemic.
The 10 year Treasury minus the 10 year implied breakeven inflation rate was practically zero in April 2015, July 2016, and August 2019. I think it’s conceivable that there will be more times in the future when there is something the financial market is worried about that causes zero to happen and yet life seems reasonably normal.
Perhaps there is no “normal” any more. Perhaps too many things are changing too fast for the first S in PSST (Patterns of Sustainable Specialization and Trade).
I hope labor markets do not go back to normal. I hope for “labor shortages” for the next two generations at least.
Enforcement of immigration law is a necessity.
Interesting challenge: is there a way to hold down inflation that does not include chronically decreasing labor shares of income?
Can you have labor shortages without inflation?
I’m waiting for the moment of reckoning in Commercial Real Estate, specifically retail and office space. The effects of the pandemic should accelerate write-downs in value in both areas, but I expect price stickiness in high quality urban areas. I don’t know how it’s going to play out and I hope Bill McBride provides updates on this. In general, I don’t think things will return to “normal” in these sectors until general population growth justifies rent levels.
Residential housing shortages will persist for decades–and prices will consequently remain high in coastal regions.
I think the pandemic revealed weaknesses in global supply chains that had been growing for decades. The “just in time” inventory model won’t return to normal for a few years. Let’s hope China doesn’t decide to invade Taiwan.
As for labor, I don’t see any long term improvement for low wage workers. The current churn in the service sector will settle down in about a year with no permanent income gains for the bottom quarter of the working population.
PCE and NGDP growth will eventually settle at 2019 levels for the following decade.
It seems the “real interest rate”, as you describe it, can only be known after the fact. We can’t know the rate of inflation going forward when we buy a bond.
Wasn’t the period from the early 1970s to the early 1980s one in which bonds outperformed stocks?