Toshiaki Iizuka, Katsuhiko Nishiyama, Brian Chen, and Karen Eggleston write,
despite the significant increase in medical care utilization at the borderline threshold, we find no evidence that the additional care improves health outcomes. This is true both for intermediate health measures and for predicted risks of mortality and serious complications. Thus, we find no evidence that DM-related medical care is cost-effective around this threshold. The results hold both in the shortrun (one year after a checkup) as well as in the medium-run (three years after a checkup). These results suggest that the threshold may need to be reexamined from the perspective of cost-effectiveness.
DM is diabetes mellitus.
1) We already knew that annual checkups are of little value.
2) Truly poorly done paper. I wouldn’t accept this from a medical student.