The team that won the most games in real baseball, the Giants, won 66 percent of their games in spite of having no hitter score more than 79 runs and no pitcher win more that 14 games. Somebody do a search through major league baseball history since 1950 (not counting strike-shortened seasons) for every team where the leader in runs had 79 or fewer and the leader in wins had 14 or fewer. I’d say that the chances are more than 99 percent that within that set the maximum winning percentage is less than 55 percent, and the average winning percentage is less than 45 percent. My expected value for the winning percentage in that set would be 35 percent, barely more than half of what the Giants managed to pull off.
On the other hand, the core of the Blue Jays offense stayed healthy, which worked well for me in fantasy. On one of my teams, I “settled” for Guerrero, Bichette, and Hernandez when I was outbid on players who for whom expectations were higher before the season started. As a result, that fantasy team averaged almost 33 home runs and 10 stolen bases per player.
Both of my teams finished with 91 points, out of a maximum of 120. One finished in first and one finished second. Of all of the factors, I would rate luck the highest. That is characteristic of what I call a shallow league–12 owners, each picking 23 players from all of the major league teams.
In this format, it pays to churn your team a lot. Adding and dropping players is like taking more shots on goal. Although I was guilty of doing this, I am somewhat offended by it. I would prefer to see the auction matter the most, since that is the phase where you can at least try to use skill. But fantasy baseball is never going to be a game like chess, governed almost entirely by skill. Dare I say that it is more like finance?
On both teams, I had the most profitable player in all of baseball (meaning the one who did the most relative to expectations): Marcus Semien. The previous year, he had no fantasy value. I only outbid others for him because I was in danger of having no one at second base with any upside.
On one team, my pitching was salvaged by Julio Urias, who was expected to win 8-10 games and wound up with 20. On the other team, the salvation came from Robbie Ray, who was so bad the previous year that nobody drafted him. Somehow, in that league I was the first one to pick him up on waivers. He might win the Cy Young Award.
Professor Kling–
I’m assuming your a Cardinals’ fan (or at least have a soft spot in your heart for them). If so, good luck today against my Dodgers. In a way, it’s too bad that the season will turn on what is basically a coin flip either for the hottest team in baseball at season’s end or the team that won 106 games in the regular season. But I’m a purist and would actually prefer something closer to the English Premier League’s structure, so I guess I can’t complain!
Regards,
Todd
I unsubscribed from baseball after they went woke and moved the all star game due to the completely benign Georgia voting law. See Ya!
Giants gone in the 1st round. Call across the bay to the Athletics understand why.
Braves. Strange justice. Atlanta was denied the all star game due to “Jim Crow 2.0”, but here they are.
Somewhere along the line, I grew weary of “rooting for the laundry” in pro sports.
I still admire when a third baseman can make a dazzling stop on that hard shot down the line, and then make that long throw to nip the runner. It never seems possible, but they do it.
But really, teams are not teams anymore, and do not represent anything. My fan days are long gone.
The NBA is odious for its kow-towing to the CCP.
I looked into it, and you’re pretty close to right. Since 1950, there were 153 MLB (non-truncated) team-seasons with team leaders in runs-scored and wins of 79 and 14 or fewer, respectively, and they averaged a win percentage of 40.6% (lower than 45%, but a little higher than 35%).
The maximum winning percentage in this group is 53%, with two teams tying at 86 wins, or 53.1% (2011 Giants and 2012 Dodgers). The 2012 Dodgers *just* made it onto the list with runs-scored and wins leaders of exactly 79 and 14, respectively, but the 2011 Giants qualified with room to spare, with respective stats leaders at only 55 (!) and 13.
Quite an impressive feat for this year’s Giants, winning a full 21 games more than the next closest teams in this list. Wow.
Wow, thanks!